Procedure-Specific Bleeding Phenotypes: A Propensity-Matched Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Blood Loss and Transfusion in CABG versus AVR

Authors

  • Yash Mathur
  • Shane Ahern
  • Kishore Doddakula

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33178/SMJ.2026.22

Abstract

Objectives

Postoperative bleeding remains a major cause of morbidity, transfusion exposure, and prolonged intensive-care stay after cardiac-surgery. Despite advances in perfusion and anaesthesia, current blood-management protocols often apply uniform transfusion thresholds across operations with distinct haemostatic profiles. Recognising these differences is essential for developing tailored, evidence-based strategies.

Methods

This single-centre retrospective study included adults undergoing elective, isolated on-pump CABG (n = 1,331) and AVR (n = 472) between 2021-2024 at Cork University Hospital. All patients received pre-operative aspirin monotherapy, ensuring antiplatelet uniformity. Data were extracted from integrated ICCA and PATS databases. The primary endpoint was 24-h chest-drain output; secondary endpoints were RBC transfusion within 48-h and significant bleeding (UDPB >= 2: drain > 801 mL or >= 2 RBC units). Continuous and categorical variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U and chi-square/Fisher tests. Propensity-score matching (1:1 nearest-neighbour, caliper 0.2 SD) adjusted for demographic, operative, and risk variables.

Results

Median (IQR) 24-h drain loss was 710 (550-900) mL after CABG versus 580 (440-800) mL after AVR (p < 0.001). RBC transfusion occurred in 39.2% vs 33.2% (p = 0.022). Significant bleeding affected 34.1% vs 29.9% (p = 0.03). After propensity matching, CABG retained higher drain loss and transfusion burden at 12- and 24-hour intervals, confirming the procedure-specific bleeding difference.

Conclusions

CABG patients exhibited higher postoperative blood loss and transfusion needs than AVR, reflecting distinct bleeding phenotypes independent of baseline risk. Tailoring transfusion thresholds to procedure-specific bleeding profiles may substantially improve haemostatic control, reduce transfusion exposure, and enhance efficiency in cardiac-surgery.

References

Published

2026-10-22

Issue

Section

Conference Proceedings

Categories

How to Cite

Procedure-Specific Bleeding Phenotypes: A Propensity-Matched Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Blood Loss and Transfusion in CABG versus AVR. (2026). UCC Student Medical Journal, 6. https://doi.org/10.33178/SMJ.2026.22